Expect to see more guns in public after a major
Supreme Court decision Thursday expanded the right to carry
firearms. In Connecticut, the ruling won’t have an immediate impact, but legal
experts think it could invite challenges to the state’s strict gun laws.
It's the biggest Second Amendment ruling since
2008. In a
6-3 decision, the
Court ruled that people have a
constitutional right to carry guns in public – although the decision allows for
restrictions in “sensitive
places such as schools and government buildings.”
It will now be up to lower courts to figure out where firearms
can be restricted, based on this new standard.
“The Court says the Second Amendment right to
have a handgun for self-defense isn’t just a gun you’re going to keep at home,”
said Quinnipiac School of Law professor Stephen Gilles. “It extends to carrying
a gun outside the home.”
The case overturns New York’s strict
pistol
permit law, which requires gun owners to provide a “special
need” to carry in public.
“New York’s proper-cause requirement violates the Fourteenth
Amendment by preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs
from exercising their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms in public
for self-defense,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the majority opinion.
Reaction was swift.
"We cannot allow New York to become the Wild, Wild West,” said New York
City Mayor Eric Adams.
Connecticut does not require a reason to carry,
but police can reject an applicant deemed “unsuitable” to own a firearm. In
spite of that limitation, Gilles believes our state’s law is safe because
justices noted, in practice, “Connecticut,
Delaware, and Rhode Island … appear to operate like ‘shall issue’
jurisdictions.“
"The message it sends to Connecticut is, if
you keep doing what you've been doing, your law is going to likely survive any
legal challenge,” he said.
Gov. Ned Lamont believes the state’s permit law
is constitutional too.
“The
court specifically distinguished our approach when it comes to the issuance of
permits and tools for law enforcement to keep firearms out of the hands of
those who may do harm,” he said in a statement. “However, we should all be
concerned that today’s ruling heralds a newly aggressive effort to second-guess
commonsense state and local policies that save lives while accommodating both
gun rights and gun safety."
But the Connecticut
Citizens Defense League, which represents 43,000 gun owners, believes the
state’s permit law is vulnerable.
"The CCDL currently has a lawsuit that we filed last year against three
major cities here in the state of Connecticut -- Hartford, Bridgeport, and New
Haven -- for making it virtually impossible for residents of their city to
apply for a permit,” said CCDL president Holly Sullivan. "In many, many cases, those time frames are being abused. Some
people are waiting a year, sometimes longer."
If police deny an applicant, they can appeal to the Board of
Firearms Permit Examiners, but that process can take more than two years.
Connecticut Attorney
General William Tong also warns other gun laws are now at risk,
including age restrictions and the state’s assault weapons ban.
“If this Bruen decision leads
to an attack on Connecticut's guns laws, we will be the firewall and we will do everything
we can to protect Connecticut families and children -- particularly kids in
school -- from gun violence,” said
Tong.
Last week, Blue Line Firearms and Tactical in
Monroe told us they believe the current permit system works well.
"We're so used to how it is here, you know,
going through the process,” said owner Richard Sprandel. “It's a big
responsibility, and we like responsible gun owners."