Bridgeport’s ballot box scandal was front and center at the Connecticut state Capitol on Tuesday. Lawmakers re-appointed a state monitor to oversee the city’s elections until the end of 2024, but Republicans said the move will do little to stop ballot abuse.
SPECIAL SESSION
Tuesday was supposed to be an uneventful special session, to move Connecticut’s presidential primary date and approve a state Supreme Court nominee. But that all changed last week, when a video surfaced showing a woman stuffing an absentee ballot drop box outside the Bridgeport government center. The city’s Democratic primary is now the focus of a lawsuit – just like it was in 2019.
State lawmakers moved quickly to re-appoint an elections monitor in Bridgeport, before November’s general election.
“They can demand to see, at any point, any record, any facility, any system,” said state Rep. Matt Blumenthal (D-Stamford), co-chair of the legislature’s Government Administration and Elections Committee.
On News 12’s “Connecticut Power and Politics” this weekend, Bridgeport Mayor Joe Ganim said he welcomes the added scrutiny.
“Bring it on,” Ganim told host Eric Landskroner. “It's important that, looking forward, that we do and we ask – as I had yesterday – for state officials to have supervised ballots going forward.”
Bridgeport had a state monitor in 2021 and 2022. But this year, an accounting error in the new state budget left the position unfilled.
NOT ENOUGH?
Critics said an elections monitor isn't enough. GOP lawmakers unsuccessfully pushed to remove the city’s – and the rest of the state’s – outdoor ballot boxes.
“We need to take a look at what has happened in Bridgeport and restore confidence in our elections,” said state Rep. Vin Candelora (R-North Branford), the Connecticut House Republican leader.
Democrats argued the boxes already have security cameras and that removing them would make it harder for the state’s poorest residents to vote.
“Do you take a wrecking ball approach and ban everything for everybody else?” asked House Speaker Matt Ritter (D-Hartford). “Or do you try to use a – more of a scalpel approach?”
The Senate’s top Republican said the issue can’t wait until the next regular session in February.
“We're going to be precise,” said state Sen. Kevin Kelly (R-Stratford). “This is not taking a wrecking ball to anything.”
Also shot down Tuesday was a GOP amendment requiring a 1-year prison sentence for election crimes. Democratic leaders said they're open to the idea next year.