How does an extra $450 a year sound?
That’s how much some parents could save under a new child tax credit that Democrats are pushing at the state Capitol.
But there’s a catch.
To pay for it, taxes would go up for Connecticut’s wealthiest families – an idea facing stiff opposition from Gov. Ned Lamont.
“IT’S VERY EXPENSIVE”
Eluvia Barios and her grandchildren hit the playground in Norwalk on Thursday.
“We decided to come to the park because it’s a beautiful day,” she said.
A day at the park is a cheap way to have fun. Barios said that raising kids is much costlier than when she did it.
“Oh my gosh,” she said. “These days it’s very expensive.”
CHILD TAX CREDIT?
Now, families could finally get some help.
Connecticut lawmakers just advanced a new child tax credit as part of a two-year tax package.
Parents could claim $150 each, for up to three children. The credit phases-out for couples making more than $200,000 a year, and single parents making more than $100,000.
It would begin with the 2026 tax year and could save families $82.7 million per year, according to a nonpartisan fiscal analysis.
“The Child Tax Credit will change lives, help to end child poverty and make Connecticut more affordable for working families like the one I grew up in,” said state comptroller Sean Scanlon. “It’s why I championed the idea of creating one in 2021, and it’s why I am so happy to see the Finance Committee advancing the creation of one today.”
“ROBIN HOOD” PLAN?
A tax break for parents may sound great, but there’s a catch. To pay for it, the wealthy would have to pay more.
Millionaires would get hit with a new 1.75% capital gains tax until 2029. If you make $25,000 in the stock market, you would owe an extra $437 in taxes.
Filers would get a one-time exemption for selling their home or business.
“It's about fairness,” said state Rep. Jason Doucette (D-Manchester). “Working poor in this state pay an effective tax rate of between 20 and 40% of their overall income, whereas the wealthiest in this state pay around 7%.”
Republicans blasted the idea.
“It's always a tax,” said state Rep. Joe Polletta (R-Watertown). “What about if we look at some reductions? Why do we always have to propose a tax?”
Even moderate Democrats are wary. Two of them voted against the capital gains surcharge on the General Assembly’s tax-writing committee.